Phyliss Schlafly has another great article on her web site where I find a lot of similarities on how restraining orders get issued.  The article is about the university system treats men and how they are being discriminated against.

For example the department of education has issued new guidelines on sexual misconduct , “In another striking proof that the Obama Administration is totally manipulated by feminists, the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights sent out a 19-page “DCL” (dear colleague letter)to colleges and universities that should make men fear attending college at all. The letter adopts the feminist theory that in all sexual controversies or accusations, the man is guilty unless he proves himself innocent.”

“This DCL carries the force of law since it purports to be an additional implementation of Title IX, the 1972 federal law that bans sex discrimination in educational institutions that receive federal assistance. But the DCL was never legislated by Congress, and it was not even launched as a regulation that requires posting for comment in the Federal Register.”

What this document is saying is that if there is a  reported instance of  sexual misconduct by a male at the school “ the school must judge an accused man based on “a preponderance of the evidence” standard. That means the campus disciplinary board (which may include feminist faculty from the Women’s Studies Department) only has to believe that the female accuser is 51 percent likely to be truthful and accurate.Furthermore, the DCL “strongly discourages” colleges from permitting an accused man “to question or cross-examine the accuser” during the hearing. And appeals must be available to both parties, which subjects the guy to double jeopardy.”

So a man can be judged by a school board and be found guilty without the male actually getting to confront his accuser. Most schools receive federal subsidies, so if schools don’t abide by these rules they face getting their funding pulled.

It seems like the department of education has stolen the governments playback on restraining orders for example:

• A Restraining Order can be issued by a court with no evidence or real proof.  It is based on little more than one person saying that they are afraid of another person, whether that person has done anything or not.
• Temporary or emergency orders can be issued without your even knowing that they are in place.

So now universities want a standard (similar to restraining orders) where they can attack men without ever having to provide real proof.  As always, my suggestion is to arm yourself with knowledge, please check my main page on restraining orders.                                  

Have you ever wondered what a restraining order actually is?In ordinary terms, it is a court document that forbids a person from being able to come in contact with another person, and can vary in degree.There are two sides when looking at a restraining order, in that it can be beneficial in helping to stop such things as domestic violence, but can also cause disruptions when it comes to divorce or custody issues.While it depends on where one lives, a restraining order can have consequences that are either minor or major.To avoid such things as jail time or fines one should make sure that they know and understand potential penalties for defying the order.

Restraining Order and Domestic Orders

While many instances of retraining orders come at the request of one individual, there is also the possibility for other instances as well.For instance, a restraining order may be put on both sides when it comes to such things as domestic violence.This can allow both individuals to cool down over a period of several days or weeks.Some orders can also be filed automatically in courts for some divorce cases or in specific locations.As stated earlier though, a majority of the time an order is requested by one person if they feel they are in danger from another individual.

When it comes to divorce cases that involve the custody rights of children, limitations play an extremely important role and should be understood clearly by both parties.Many times an order can be very specific.For example, if the child comes down with the flu or something it may be in violation of the order to even contact the other person about it.While this may seem like an extreme case, it is important to always know what the limits for the safety and protection of the children in question.Someone could possibly go to jail if the order specifically does not allow the aforementioned example to happen, so it is always better to be safe than sorry by making sure there are exceptions within the order. See my previous blog post on other facts you should be aware of about restraining orders.

Restraining Order and Penalties

In regards to penalties for violating a restraining order, there are many different situations that must be taken into consideration before an exact punishment can be made.Situations include if there was any crime committed, how the order was broken, and so on.Penalties can range anywhere from having to take anger management courses to spending actual time in jail.Usually when orders are broken in instances of domestic violence the penalty may be more severe.

When it comes to the more severe penalties that one could face, obviously if one were to violate the order more than once they can expect a harsher penalty.What is meant by a harsher penalty is a longer time spent in jail as well as higher fines to pay.When it comes down to it one should never try to defy a restraining order if they can help it. If you need help with a restraining order please check out restrainingorder911.com                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

I have always been asked why Restraining Orders became such as passion of mine; the fact is that I was a victim of one. During the course of my divorce my wife had a restraining order placed on me. In the course of me fighting this judgment I had to deal with the legal system, the lawyers and judges. And the more I saw the more I realized how corrupt the legal system is. I am not Mr. Clean and I have done and still do many things that cause me a bad conscience (Immanuel Kant said it best “Out of timber so crooked as that from which man is made nothing entirely straight can be carved”). However, I have contempt towards many people in the legal system because many of them could actually afford to come forward and try to clean up the system but never do as they benefit to greatly by the system. States get paid by the federal government to have victims in the federal courts. (see my previous articles on (V.A.W.A)Instead, we have parasites in the system that perpetuate an environment where corruption is rewarded and honesty looked on as a weakness.

I use to work on Wall Street as a trader and really believed in free markets, but after the 2008 crash and all the subsequent bailouts my eyes were opened once more in how the government really perverts justice. Ayn Rand come once again to my mind: “When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion – when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors -when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you -when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self sacrifice – you may know that your society is doomed” (Ayn Rand, “Atlas Shrugged”, Francisco’s “Money Speech”).

Restraining Orders Pervert Justice

The same way the bank bailouts perverted justice as the banks that were insolvent were saved by solvent taxpayers. It was the reverse of Robin Hood; the government robbed the poor to pay the rich. Restraining orders are used in the same vein, they perverse the true sense of justice. In the U.S, our legal system is based on innocent until proven guilty; however a restraining order can be issued by a court with no evidence or real proof.  It is based on little more than one person saying that they are afraid of another person, whether that person has done anything or not.

I love it when I see other lawyers make blog posts about restraining orders as it brings more light to the terrible injustices that occur. I came across this article by a lawyer in Massachusetts who really goes into some of the pitfalls if you are served a restraining order.

The article mostly deals with the laws in the state but restraining order violations are fairly consistent among all states. I have highlighted some of the authors main points here:

• A Restraining Order can be issued by a court with no evidence or real proof.  It is based on little more than one person saying that they are afraid of another person, whether that person has done anything or not.
• Temporary or emergency orders can be issued without your even knowing that they are in place.
• Restraining Orders  are often used by disgruntled spouses where divorces have turned spiteful or by angry ex-spouses when child support or visitation is at issue.
• Restraining Orders many times are  used as a tactic to prevent involved parents from being a part of their child’s lives.

In a previous post, I talked about how restraining orders also impact the extended family. Many grandparents lose all contact with their grandchildren because of these laws.  So in these instances the child loses all contact with one side of the family, that is a disgarce.

If you need help fighting your restraining order please make sure you go to restrainingorder911.com                                                                      

As someone who was not allowed to see their children for close to a year I was even shocked to that this grandparent had not seen their grandchildren in over thirty months. http://jacquesclouseau.free-forums.org/grandmother-feels-the-pain-of-restraining-order-abuse-vt626.html

The grandmother made an interesting comment “I just think it’s too darn easy for the women to get these restraining orders”,  and I feel the same way. When most people think of restraining order (protective order), the image of an out of control husband beating their wife comes to mind. But the truth about restraining orders is entirely different. The reason being is there are no penalties for a women if she make false allegations in getting a restraining order. So when a woman asks a judge to get a restraining order, if a man loses his job, home or children because a woman makes false claims against him,  legally  she  is not even required to say she is sorry. The system is on her side, and even if a man is found innocent, his reputation is damaged. Because there are no consequence for filing a false restraining order,  women going through a divorce will use it as a tool against their husbands in order to gain leverage.

Here are some of the ways restraining orders are used:

A.  To gain an advantage in a divorce; (Some divorce lawyers routinely advise getting one.)

B. To quickly get custody of your children without a hearing

C. She is tired of being ignored or unloved

D. To keep you from your children as a cruel punishment

E. To stop you from modifying custody after your child expresses a desire to live with you.

F. To quickly put you out of the house without an eviction or a Probate Court hearing.

G. To allow the complainant to get a new boy/girlfriend into the picture and you out.

H. To get vengeance for some offense you did to her, such as cheating.

I. To control or manipulate you, or get leverage in some way.

J. She got manipulated by a victim-witness advocate.

K. To enjoy watching you suffer.

L. To obtain money and assistance from a domestic abuse shelter;.

M. You have been a complete jerk, and she just doesn’t want you around anymore.

The point is that restraining orders are being used in ways that were never intended. In order to protect yourself go to my site http://www.restrainingorder911.com/